If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is often only performed If your employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations as such they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Article 199 from the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It truly is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust accessible remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.

This is because transfer orders are typically thought of within the administrative discretion from the employer. However, there could be exceptions in cases where the transfer is enthusiastic by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also assure respect on the family shed in accordance with legislation and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security in the house is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. 9. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be realized. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated higher than. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Cell Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more

However it really is made obvious that police is free to get action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. However no harassment shall be caused into the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of law. Police shall also guarantee regard on the family lose in accordance with law and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they will act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate for a issue of security of your house is concerned, which isn't public place under the Act 1977. 9. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been attained. For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that though looking at the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the advantage of every one of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who're found to be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part of the respondent department.

Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment at the same time. The disparity inside the fork out scale allowances of Stenographers within the District Judiciary is during the distinct negation on the law laid down with the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. here Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision on the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.

Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. Although this style of law strives to condition our society, offering rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

Because the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, apart from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $two hundred. Additionally, it regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.